![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
and Authority of the Bible
|
| Divine origin and causality; | |
| Human agency; | |
| Written verbally (in words); | |
| Plenary (all of Scripture is inspired, not just parts of it); | |
| Only the "Autographs" (the original documents penned by the biblical authors) are inspired; | |
| Because Scripture is inspired, it is inerrant; and | |
| Because Scripture is inspired and inerrant, it alone has final authority. |
The word inspiration literally means "God-breathed" in the Greek. And because Scripture is breathed out by God, it is true and inerrant. Consider the following syllogism:
God is true (Romans 3:4).
God breathed out the Scriptures (2 Timothy 3:16).
Therefore, the Scriptures are true (John 17:17).
As illustrated above, the inerrancy of Scripture can be inferred by premises that are themselves taught by Scripture.
We read in Scripture that truth is an attribute of God (Jeremiah 10:10; John 1:14; 14:6; 17:3), and that God speaks truthfully--that is, He does not lie (Numbers 23:19; 1 Samuel 15:29; Titus 1:2; Romans 3:3-4).
We also are told that Scripture is "breathed out" by God (2 Timothy 3:16).
The Word of God, then, is true (John 17:14,17; cf. Psalm 119:142; 151; 160; Revelation 21:5; 22:6).
Second Peter 1:21 tells us that "prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." The word moved in this verse literally means to be "borne along" or "carried along."
Even though human beings were used in the process of writing down God's Word, they were all literally "borne along" by the Holy Spirit.
The human wills of the authors were not the originators or the carriers of God's message....God did not permit the will of sinful man to divert, misdirect, or erroneously record His message.
God moved and the prophet mouthed these truths; God revealed and man recorded His word.
Interestingly, the Greek word for "moved" in 2 Peter 1:21 is the same word found in Acts 27:15-17.
The experienced sailors could not navigate the ship because the wind was so strong.
The ship was being driven, directed, and carried about by the wind.
This is similar to the Spirit's driving, directing, and carrying the human authors of the Bible as He wished.
The word is a strong one, indicating the Spirit's complete superintendence of the human authors.
Yet, just as the sailors were active on the ship (though the wind, not the sailors, controlled the ship's movement), so the human authors were active in writing as the Spirit directed.
The Old Testament
recognizes that it is the Holy Spirit who speaks through its
writers (2 Samuel 23:2-3).
Indeed, many Old Testament passages quoted in the New Testament
are said to have the Holy Spirit as their author, even though a
human prophet actually spoke the words in the Old Testament
(see Mark 12:36; Acts 1:16; 28:25; Hebrews 3:7;
10:15-16).
The psalmist said (Psalm 95:7)/The Holy Spirit said (Hebrews 3:7)
The psalmist said (Psalm 45:6)/God said (Hebrews 1:8)
The psalmist said (Psalm 102:25,27)/God said (Hebrews 1:10-12)
Isaiah said (Isaiah 7:14)/The Lord spoke by the prophet (Matthew 1:22-23)
Hosea said (Hosea 11:1)/The Lord spoke by the prophet (Matthew 2:1).
Eliphaz's words (Job 5:13)/God's Word (1 Corinthians 3:19).
MORE EXAMPLES:
Acts 1:16 is a highly significant verse in this regard, for we read: "Men and brethren, this scripture must needs have been fulfilled, which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus" (emphasis added).
Likewise, we read in Acts 4:24-25: "And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in them is: Who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things?" (emphasis added).
And again, we read in Acts 28:25: "When they agreed not among themselves, they departed, after that Paul had spoken one word, Well spake the Holy Ghost by Esaias the prophet unto our fathers" (emphasis added).
In 2 Samuel 23:2 we
read the following words from the mouth of David: "The Spirit
of the lord spake by me, and his word was in my tongue." Here
is a clear reference to a human being used as a mouthpiece for
the spirit of God.
Similarly, we read in Isaiah 59:21, "As for me, this is my
covenant with them, saith the lord; My spirit that is upon
thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth..." (emphasis
added). Though God used human beings in the process of
communicating His words, it is clear that the Holy Spirit was
in charge of the process so that no human error or opinion
entered into the picture.
Turning to Jeremiah 1:9 we read, "Then the lord put forth his
hand, and touched my mouth. And the lord said unto me, Behold,
I have put my words in thy mouth." Again, we see that God is in
control of the process of communicating His word to man.
Speaking of the Old Testament prophets in general, we read in
Zechariah 7:12, "Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant
stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which the
lord of hosts hath sent in his spirit by the former prophets:
therefore came a great wrath from the lord of hosts" (emphasis
added).
Jesus promised His
followers that it would be the work of the Holy Spirit to
provide an accurate recounting of the events of His life (John
14:26).
And because of this, you and I can trust the Bible as the Word
of God. The Holy Spirit superintended the process from
beginning to end. Let's look at more details of this doctrine
in the New Testament.
Second Timothy 3:16 tells us, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness."
When Paul said that "all Scripture" is inspired, did he have in mind just the Old Testament (which is a common New Testament usage of the word "Scripture"), or did he have a larger grouping in mind (a grouping that included some New Testament books)? This is a very important question. We think the later is the case for at least two important reasons.
The apostle Paul had already described a specific New Testament book as "Scripture" in his first letter to Timothy (see 1 Timothy 5:18 where the Gospel of Luke is called Scripture). It therefore makes sense that when Paul used the term "Scripture" in his second letter to Timothy, he was thinking not just of Old Testament books but also of New Testament books that had been written up to that time.
The apostle Peter
uses the same Greek word for "Scripture" to describe the
writings of the apostle Paul (2 Peter 3:16).
Here is the important point: By the time 2 Timothy 3:16 was
written, all of the New Testament books had already been
written except for 2 Peter, Hebrews, Jude, and the apostle
John's writings. In view of this, Paul was surely including
these books in the phrase "all Scripture is inspired" in 2
Timothy 3:16. And since the remaining books were later
acknowledged as belonging to the canon of Scripture, we may
safely say that this verse says something about all 66 books of
the Bible.
Now, the word "inspired" comes from a Greek word meaning "God-breathed."
The Greek form is passive. This means the Bible is the result of the "breath of God."
If the form were active, then the verse would be saying that all the Bible breathes or exudes God.
But here we are told that God breathed out something, namely, the Scripture. The origin of the Bible is thus seen to be God.
In 1 Timothy 5:18, the apostle Paul joins an Old Testament reference and a New Testament reference and calls them both (collectively) Scripture (Deuteronomy 25:4 and Luke 10:7).
It is not unusual that--in the context of first-century Judaism--an Old Testament passage was called "Scripture" in the New Testament.
But it is highly significant that a New Testament book was called "Scripture" so soon after it was written.
We must emphasize that only three to six years had elapsed between the writing of the Gospel of Luke and the writing of 1 Timothy (Luke was written around A.D. 60; 1 Timothy was written around A.D. 63). Yet, despite this, Paul does not hesitate to place Luke on the same level as the Old Testament (the Book of Deuteronomy).
Divine Inspiration:
Matthew 22:43
Indestructibility:
Matthew 5:17-18
Infallibility:
John 10:35
Final Authority:
Matthew 4:4,7,10
Historicity:
Matthew 12:40; 24:37
Scientific Accuracy:
Matthew 19:2-5
Factual Inerrancy:
John 17:17; Matthew 22:29
Christ-Centered Unity:
Luke 24:27; John 5:39
Spiritual Clarity:
Luke 24:25
Faith and Life Sufficiency:
Luke 16:31
In 1 Corinthians 2:13 the apostle Paul said he spoke "not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual."
In this passage Paul (who wrote a huge portion of the New Testament) affirms that his words were authoritative because they were rooted not in fallible man but infallible God (the Holy Spirit). The words were taught by the Holy Spirit. The Spirit here is the Spirit of truth who was promised to the apostles to teach and guide them into all the truth (see John 16:13).
In this verse Paul says, "If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord." Paul's writings have divine authority because they are "commandments of the Lord," not the words of fallen man.
In 1 Thessalonians 2:13 Paul says, "For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe."
Again, the reason why Paul's words were authoritative is that they were rooted in God, not in man. God used Paul as His instrument to communicate His word to man. Regarding this, note the following summary formulated by the Synod of the Christian Reformed Church in 1961:
It is significant that Paul, while holding to the view of a canon of God-breathed writings which constitute "the oracles of God," claims for his own teaching, either oral or written, equal status.
The word that he preached was not "the word of men" but "the word of God" (1 Thess. 2:13).
That which he wrote was "the commandment of the Lord" (1 Cor. 14:37).
He that does not obey the writing of the apostle is to be disciplined (2 Thess. 3:14).
If any man preach or teach any other gospel than that which Paul proclaimed, he is to be accursed (Gal. 1:8-9).
When Paul speaks as an apostle of Jesus Christ to the churches it is "Christ that speaketh" in him (2 Cor. 13:3).
Paul did not learn his gospel at the feet of men but rather received it "through revelations of Jesus Christ," Gal. 1:12, some of which were "exceeding great" (2 Cor. 12:7).
From the Book of
Genesis to the Book of Malachi, the Old Testament abounds with
anticipations of the coming Messiah. Numerous predictions--fulfilled to the "crossing of the t" and the "dotting of the i"
in the New Testament--relate to His birth, life, ministry,
death, resurrection, and glory. These fulfilled prophecies
constitute a powerful apologetic for the inspiration of
Scripture.
The New Testament writers often pointed to how Christ was the
specific fulfillment of a messianic prophecy in the Old
Testament. Below is a sampling of these prophecies.
Seed of woman:
Genesis 3:15
Virgin Birth:
Isaiah 7:14
Birthplace: Bethlehem:
Micah 5:2
Forerunner: John:
Malachi 3:1
Ministry of miracles:
Isaiah 35:5-6
Sold for 30 shekels:
Zechariah 11:12
Hands and feet pierced:
Psalm 22:16
Crucified with thieves:
Isaiah 53:12
No bones broken:
Psalm 22:17
Suffered thirst on cross:
Psalm 69:21
Resurrection:
Psalm 16:10; 22:22
It is only logical to conclude that if these prophecies were
written many hundreds of years before they were fulfilled--and
if they could never have been foreseen, and depended upon
factors outside human control for their fulfillment--and if
all of these prophecies were, in fact, precisely fulfilled--then clearly the Scriptures are divine in origin and not
man-made.
The Bible's accuracy
and reliability has been proved and verified over and over
again by archeological finds produced by both believing and
nonbelieving scholars and scientists.
This includes verification for numerous customs, places, names,
and events mentioned in the Bible.
Nelson Glueck, a specialist in ancient literature, said: "It
can be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery
has ever controverted a biblical reference."
Bible scholar Donald J. Wiseman said, "The geography of Bible
lands and visible remains of antiquity were gradually recorded
until today more than 25,000 sites within this region and
dating to Old Testament times, in their broadest sense, have
been located...." (25,000 sites!)
Well-known Bible scholar William F. Albright said: "Discovery
after discovery has established the accuracy of innumerable
details, and has brought increased recognition of the value of
the Bible as a source of history." Archeological studies have
been a true friend to the Christian Bible.
Besides Christian
witnesses in the early centuries of Christianity, there were
also non-Christian sources living close to the time of Christ
that corroborate Christ as a historical figure.
For example, Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (born A.D. 37)
made reference to "Jesus, the so-called Christ."
Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (born A.D. 52) wrote of
"Christus," who was "put to death by Pontius Pilate."
Pliny the Younger (A.D. 112) spoke of the "troublesome sect of
Christians."
Suetonius (A.D. 120) spoke of disturbances over "Chrestus"
(Christ).
All in all, the "external evidence" for the reliability of the
Bible is overwhelming.
The authority of the
Bible is a natural outgrowth of the Bible as inspired
revelation from God. As Robert Lightner puts it,
When the questions of revelation and inspiration with regard to
the Bible have been answered, the issue of authority will have
been settled. In other words, how one views revelation and
inspiration will determine how he views the Bible's
authority....Since the written revelation from God has been
recorded under the Spirit's superintendence and is "the very
breath of God," it is therefore authoritative--just as
authoritative as the One who gave it.
The authority of Scripture cannot be separated from the
authority of God. Whatever the Bible affirms, God affirms. And
what the Bible affirms (or denies), it affirms (or denies) with
the very authority of God." Theologian Rene Pache agrees,
noting that "if God entirely inspired Scripture (as we have
seen that He did), then Scripture is vested with His
authority."
![]()