Is
Annihilationism Biblical?
The
doctrine of annihilationism teaches that man was created
immortal. But those who continue in sin and reject Christ are
by a positive act of God deprived of the gift of immortality
and are ultimately destroyed.
Another view, called
"conditional immortality," argues that immortality is not a
natural endowment of man, but is rather a gift of God in Christ
only to those who believe. The person that does not accept
Christ is ultimately annihilated and loses all consciousness.
Some of the advocates of these doctrines teach a limited
duration of conscious suffering for the wicked after death,
after which time they are annihilated.
There are many
passages that refute annihilationism. For illustration
purposes, we will select only one primary passage--Matthew
25:46: "Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the
righteous to eternal life."
By no stretch of the
imagination can the punishment spoken of in Matthew 25:46 be
defined as a nonsuffering extinction of consciousness. Indeed,
if actual suffering is lacking, then so is punishment. Let us
be clear on this: punishment entails suffering. And suffering
necessarily entails consciousness.
Bible scholar John
Gerstner tells us that "one can exist and not be punished; but
no one can be punished and not exist. Annihilation means the
obliteration of existence and anything that pertains to
existence, such as punishment. Annihilation avoids punishment,
rather than encountering it."
How do we know that
the punishment referred to in Matthew 25:46 does not entail an
extinction of consciousness and annihilation? There are many
evidences. For example, consider the fact that there are no
degrees of annihilation. One is either annihilated or one is
not. The Scriptures, by contrast, teach that there will be
degrees of punishment on the day of judgment (Matthew 10:15;
11:21-24; 16:27; Luke 12:47-48; John 15:22; Hebrews 10:29;
Revelation 20:11-15; 22:12).
The very fact that
people will suffer varying degrees of punishment in hell shows
that annihilation or the extinction of consciousness is not
taught in Matthew 25:46 or anywhere else in Scripture. These
are incompatible concepts.
Moreover, one cannot
deny that for one who is suffering excruciating pain, the
extinction of his or her consciousness would actually be a
blessing--not a punishment (cf. Luke 23:30-31; Revelation
9:6). Any honest seeker after truth must admit that one cannot
define "eternal punishment" as an extinction of
consciousness.
We must emphasize
that torment cannot, by definition, be anything but conscious
torment. One cannot torment a tree, a rock, or a house. By its
very nature, being tormented requires consciousness. Bible
scholar Alan Gomes correctly points out that "a punishment
[such as torment] that is not felt is not a punishment.
It is an odd use of language to speak of an insensate (i.e.,
unfeeling), inanimate object receiving punishment. To say, 'I
punished my car for not starting by slowly plucking out its
sparkplug wires, one by one,' would evoke laughter, not serious
consideration." We repeat, then, that punishment entails
consciousness!
A critical point to
make in regard to Matthew 25:46 is that this punishment is said
to be eternal. There is no way that annihilationism or an
extinction of consciousness can be forced into this passage.
Indeed, the adjective aionion in this verse literally means
"everlasting, without end." As noted earlier, this same
adjective is predicated of God (the "eternal" God) in 1 Timothy
1:7, Romans 16:26, Hebrews 9:14, 13:8, and Revelation 4:9. The
punishment of the wicked is just as eternal as our eternal
God.